Sell or Process Decisions

Should a business sell its product immediately, or should it sell them at a premium after further processing?

This is a common concern for organizations looking for ways to add more value to their products. A business can increase its profit if the additional revenue from further processing exceeds the extra cost.

Sell-or-process decisions involve the cost-benefit analysis of further processing of a product or service.

When evaluating sell-or-process decisions, it is important to compare the incremental revenue and cost of further processing.

Unavoidable costs incurred before any additional processing takes place are not relevant to sell-or-process decisions.


Lisa, a farmer, is planning for the upcoming harvest of grapes.

The estimated production of fresh grapes for this season is 10 MT.

Lisa will spend $2000 on pre-harvest expenses for preparing the crop.

Two options are available to Lisa for selling grapes.

Option A

Sell fresh grapes to retailers.

The expected selling price of fresh grapes is $1500 / MT.

Packaging would cost $200 / MT.

Transportation cost is estimated at $300 / MT.

Option B

Lisa can dehydrate the fresh grapes in summer and sell them as dry grapes in winter.

10 MT of fresh grapes can be processed into 2 MT of dry grapes.

The price of dry grapes in winter is estimated at $12,000 / MT.

The cost of the dehydration process is $500 / MT of fresh grapes.

Packaging and storage of dry grapes cost $3000 / MT.

Transportation cost of dry grapes is $500 / MT.

Calculate which option will maximize Lisa’s profit.

We need to compare the incremental revenue of each option with its incremental cost.

Option A Immediate Sale Option B Further Process

Sales Revenue

[$1,500 × 10 MT]

[$12,000 × 2 MT]

Processing Cost


[$500 × 10 MT]

Packaging & storage

[$200 × 10 MT]

[$3,000 × 2 MT]


[$300 × 10 MT]

[$500 × 2 MT]

Total cost



Option B is more profitable.

Pre-harvest costs are unavoidable and therefore ignored in the calculation.

Joint Products

Sell-or-process decisions involving joint products should only consider costs after the split-off point (i.e. when joint products can be identified separately).

Joint products are manufactured simultaneously in a joint process and share common inputs.

For example, slaughtering a cow (joint process) produces beef and leather (joint products). The cow is the common input of joint products.

Joint costs (i.e. costs up to the split-off point) are not relevant to the decision as they are unavoidable.


Pharma Inc. produces two medical products from a joint process: Aspro and Brufo.

Information relating to the two products is as follows:

Aspro Brufo

Sales Revenue



Joint cost






Brufo can be processed further to produce Citro.

Citro can be sold for $20,000 but requires additional processing cost of $3000.

Should Brufo be sold immediately or processed further?

Additional revenue from selling Citro is $5000 ($20,000 – $15,000).

The additional cost of producing Citro is $3000.

Since the incremental revenue from further processing exceeds the additional cost, Citro should be produced.

Share This Post

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on print
Scroll to Top